Who Ordained Orthodox Medicine and where did it come from?
Obama Care and The New World Order
An academic circumspection:
By David Freed BS-CLS MLS (ASCP)cm
www.ponderingconfusion.com
08/23/2010
We are living in an enlightened age. This is the 21st century after all. In a medical emergency no one today would trust their lives to a ‘Pagan Witchdoctor.’ To an educated population, Standard Medical Practice is the obvious choice.
But who is it that decides which medical practices are legitimate? Who is it that decides for which medical therapies insurance will, or will not, pay? And - who decides which medical therapies fall into the realm of Holistic or Naturopathic Medicine verses the Orthodoxy of Standard Medical Practice?
This paper will first attempt to answer these questions and that answer may surprise you. This paper will go on to show that the Mega-Corp Conspiracy of Orthodox Medicine is not the champion of good health, or even has much concern for the general welfare of the population. Finally, this paper will Ponder the possibility that Orthodox Medicine may be just a tool of the World’s Elite aimed at population control and corporate profiteering.
My Story
I have worked in a hospital laboratory for almost 20 years. I have seen, first hand, what Orthodox Medicine has done to my community and my society. I have met many amazingly bright people and seen a few recoveries that border on miraculous. Due to my degree of patient contact, I have been required to submit to a yearly Tuberculosis Skin Test (PPD). This year my PPD was positive.
I had to wait two days to learn the interpretation of my follow up chest x-ray, which is absolutely clear! No evidence of TB what-so-ever! My positive PPD skin test only proves that I have been exposed – not infected.
So, I asked – what I thought to be a good question:
“Each PPD skin test exposes me to a small – attenuated – Tuberculin protein. Couldn’t the 17 or 18 years of consecutive Yearly-PPDs be sufficient exposure to cause my positive result?”
The absolute best answer anyone could give was – well maybe.
There have been no studies. However, I soon discovered that many old-timers in Medicine, people that have had patient contact for 20+ years, have positive PPDs. Everyone just assumes that over the years they were exposed by patient contact somehow.
NOW – I am pressured into a yearly Flu Shot. After all, the benefits out weight the risk.
So, I asked – what I thought was a good question: “RISK – has anyone ever considered the cumulative effect of that risk, with consecutive yearly inoculations? “
Not enough data available to accurately predict – is exactly the same as saying, Mr. Guinea Pig, it is ok to keep testing it on you and they will let you know later if it was harmful.
I wonder what my choice will be, if my employer ever mandates the flu shot.
Diabetes
I have already authored the paper, Diabetes, Sucrose (table Sugar), and the unhealthy consequence of a free market, attempting to illuminate the disregard for public health by the sugar industry, or any industry.
Ah – the American dream: Find something you can make for a dime, sell for a dollar, and is addictive – SUGAR! Consider, that as of 2005, the average American consumed 31 5-lbs-bags of sugar per year. Correlate that with the explosion of Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Adult On-set Diabetes Type II.
It is my experience; many code-blue (heart attack) patients have very high Glucose levels, in the 200 to 300 range. As part of a code response team, for several years, I can tell you that the two most common requests from the lab are Blood PH and Glucose. I have asked physicians about the apparent trend in sweet heart attacks. They all bring the issue back around to the years of Cholesterol abuse. But – what about the years of abuse that caused the higher than normal Glucose levels?
Nutrition and Orthodox Medicine
Ponder this - We are all taught in elementary school that we should eat our vegetables, because the secret of good health is a balance diet with all the proper vitamins and nutrients required for our metabolisms to function at their peak efficiencies. So, why won’t insurance companies pay for nutritional therapies to combat Diabetes or Cancer?
Instead, nutrition has been pushed off into the realm of Naturopathic Medicine. For example, The ZONE diet decreases insulin dependency in Type II Diabetics. The Zone Diet was originally published, 20 years ago, by Dr. Barry Sears a leading authority on the dietary control of hormonal response; and a former research scientist at the Boston University School of Medicine and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Barry Sears PhD., The Anti-Inflammation Zone: Reversing the Silent Epidemic That's Destroying our Health, (2005) Harper-Collins Publishers, NY.)
So why haven’t any of the diabetic patients I see ever heard of it? In fact, in my opinion, most of the diabetic patients I see have never seen anything close to a balanced diet. Why don’t Diabetic Educators make this a bigger issue?
The Vaccine Controversy
Another paper in this series: “The Vaccine Controversy,” exposes that mandatory vaccines adversely affect millions of people every year. In fact, the general public is essentially unaware of the true number of people -- mostly children -- who have been permanently damaged or killed by vaccines. Every year between 12,000 and 14,000 reports of adverse reactions to vaccines are made to the FDA (data initially accessible only through the Freedom of Information Act). These figures include hospitalizations, irreversible brain damage, and hundreds of deaths. Considering that these numbers may represent just 10 percent, the true figures could be as high as 140,000 adverse events annually. However, even this figure could be conservative. According to Dr. David Kessler, former head of the Food and Drug Administration, "Only about 1 percent of serious events [adverse drug reactions] are reported to the FDA." Thus, it is entirely possible that mandatory vaccines adversely affect millions of people every year. (Think Twice, Secret Government Database of Vaccine-Damaged Children, http://thinktwice.com/ secret.htm)
Thimerosal
Thimerosal is the preservative of choice for vaccine manufacturers. First introduced by Eli Lilly and Company in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the company began selling it as a preservative in vaccines in the 1940s. Thimerosal contains 49.6 percent mercury by weight and is metabolized or degraded into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Mercury, or more precisely, ethylmercury, is the principle agent that kills contaminants. Unfortunately, mercury also kills much more than that.
Mercury is classified as a hazardous material that could cause death if swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Studies indicate that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines. Mercury poisoning has been linked to cardiovascular disease, autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia and many other nervous system conditions. The toxicity of mercury has never been in question. The real question is precisely how much mercury-laced thimerosal is toxic, and what are the possible consequences for our children at low doses?
Thimerosal was eliminated in many countries 20 years ago. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal, suffered brain damage years later. Studies on thimerosal poisoning also describe tubular necrosis and nervous system injury, including coma and death. As a result of these findings, Russia banned thimerosal from children's vaccines in 1980. Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have also banned the preservative.
Some vaccines, such as vaccines for hepatitis B, required of all health professionals, contained as much as 12.5 micrograms of mercury per dose. That's more than 100 times the EPA's upper limit standard when administered to infants.
The issue that Confuses this author is the statement that, if any one dose of a childhood vaccine only contains the safe and allowable level of mercury; then how can orthodox medicine justify multiple dosing by giving multiple vaccinations simultaneously?
The National Vaccine Information Center in Virginia, has noted a strong association between the MMR vaccine and autistic features. Reporting similar findings, the Encephalitis Support Group in England claims that children who became autistic after the MMR vaccine started showing autistic symptoms as early as 30 days after vaccination. The diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine (DPT) given at two, four and six months has triggered autistic symptoms, as well.
The Urabe Atrocity
This is the MMR vaccine with the Urabe mumps strain, called Pluserix & Immravax in UK, Trivirix in Canada. Canada withdrew licenses for the vaccine in May 1988, yet the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunizations still went ahead and introduced it into the UK, in 1988! Four years later, on September 14, 1992 it was eventually banned in the UK after it was revealed that children developed meningitis. Following the New Zealand government withdrew Pluserix, on Sept 16, 1992.
Yet some five years later, in 1997: the Smith Kline Beecham Urabe MMR jab was used in a mass vaccination program in Brazil.
Just one, obvious and extreme example of the Pharmaceutical / Governmental sponsored agencies complete disregard for child health, and in favor with mass corporate gain. ( Vaccination Statistics http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html )
The public impression
The public impression today is that mercury just isn’t used in vaccines any more, and that vaccines are relativity safe. Then I ask just what we can make of the following press releases:
London Associated Press (Maria Cheng - Medical Writer), as reported in the Chicago Tribune, October 21, 2011: Experts Say Mercury Ban Could Hamper Vaccine Production. Scientists are warning officials negotiating a global treaty on mercury that banning the deadly chemical completely would be dangerous for public health because of the chemical's use in vaccines. The ban option is one of several proposals on the table for a meeting later this month in Nairobi, but a final treaty isn't expected until 2013. The WHO says that "mercury is one of the top 10 chemicals of public health concern and is highly toxic…” (From the American Society for Clinical pathology, Daily Diagnosis, 10/24/2011 http://ascp bulletinhealthcare com/ story.aspx? dt=111024)
United Kingdom’s Daily Mail (Sadie Whitelocks) reported on October 27 2011: 300,000 doses of flu vaccine Preflucel withdrawn in alert over side-effects. The flu vaccine has been recalled from thousands of surgeries and pharmacies across Europe amid fears it is making people ill. The drug is to be immediately withdrawn following fears from health bosses that the most recent batch, issued last month, is causing side-effects. Newbury-based Baxter Healthcare, which manufacturers the drug, approved for use in March said that patients with concerns should contact their GP. A statement read: 'There has been a higher-than-expected reporting of adverse reactions after administration of vaccines from this batch. 'Any stock should be quarantined and returned via the normal channels. (http://www.dailymail.co uk/health/article 2054160/ 300-000-doses-flu-vaccine-Preflucel-withdrawn-alert-effects.html#ixzz1fXqwog4X)
How about the new mandatory HPV Vaccine?
The Texas based Merk & Company is the second largest pharmaceutical manufacture in the world, according to revenue. It is also the company that made many headlines at the turn of the century over its wonder drug Vioxx.
Vioxx was used to reduce pain, inflammation, and stiffness caused by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and certain forms of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis; to manage acute pain in adults; to treat migraines; and to treat menstrual pain. Wow, one single drug could do all that.
However, Merk & Co. was forced to announce a voluntary withdrawal of the drug, Vioxx, from the U.S. and worldwide market in 2004. This withdrawal is due to safety concerns of an increased risk of cardiovascular events (including heart attack and stroke) in patients taking Vioxx. Let me repeat those darn side effects – heart attack and stroke. OOPS! (Drug information online @ Drugs.com http://www.drugs.com/vioxx.html)
Currently, Merk & Co. is aggressively lobbying law makers to mandate its new HPV vaccine for all children. Merck, advertises GARDASIL as the only human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine that helps protect against 4 types of HPV. In girls and young women ages 9 to 26, GARDASIL helps protect against 2 types of HPV that cause about 75% of cervical cancer cases, and 2 more types that cause 90% of genital warts cases. In boys and young men ages 9 to 26, GARDASIL helps protect against 90% of genital warts cases. GARDASIL also helps protect girls and young women ages 9 to 26 against 70% of vaginal cancer cases and up to 50% of vulvar cancer cases. (http://www.gardasil.com/ index.html?WT.mc id=GL0ES&MTD=2)
Since Gardasil’s introduction in 2006, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received more than 20,000 reports of adverse side effects reportedly related to Gardasil. (Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., Attorneys at Law, The Truth about Gardasil, http://www.thetruthaboutgardasil.com/)
It was in 2008 when Judicial Watch obtained documents from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration documenting “anaphylactic shock,” “foaming at mouth,” “grand mal convulsion,” “coma” and “now paralyzed” descriptions of the complications from Gardasil.
At that time, the organization’s work uncovered reports of about one death a month, bringing the total death toll from the drug to at least 18 and as many as 20 at that time. The new report documents that there have been at least another 16 fatalities in the months since, along with 789 “serious” reports of reactions submitted to the FDA. Two hundred thirteen of the cases in the most recent reporting period resulted in a permanent disability and 25 resulted in Guillain-Barre syndrome. (Bob Unruh, Controversial STD drug tied to 16 more deaths, 09/28/2010, WorldNetDaily Exclusive: http://www.wnd.com/2010/09/209341/ )
So, I ask: “Just how safe is this new vaccine?”
Polio and Cancer
In 1950, the rate of cancers in America was <20%. Polio, on the other hand effected (at greatest estimate) 37% of the population. As early as 1953, scientist warned that using monkey tissues to manufacture the new polio vaccine could cause Simian (monkey) viral particles to piggyback into the vaccine.
Simian Virus (SV-40) was identified in the vaccine. Studies then proved, beyond any doubt, that Simian Virus (SV-40) causes cancer in several species – including humans. Oops! - by 1960, the polio vaccine had been given to approximately 100,000 million Americans.
The good news – Polio has almost been eradicated from the population.
The bad news - ‘The federal agency in charge of vaccine licensing and safety, the Division of Biologics Standards of the National Institute of Health, did not recall of any of the SV40-contaminated vaccines. The tainted vaccines continued to be administered until 1963 when they were all used and replaced by allegedly SV40-free vaccines.’ (Michael E. Horwin, M.A., J.D, Simian Virus 40 (SV40): A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines, 2003, Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 13, Number 3, http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html)
Today – the rate of cancer in America is >50% for men and >35% for women.
Breast Cancer and Mammograms
To put it plainly, the introduction of screening mammography has been associated with sustained increases in breast cancer incidence. (Per-Henrik Zahl, MD, PhD; Jan Mæhlen, MD, PhD; H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH, The Natural History of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Mammography, November 24th, 2008, Vol. 168, Number 21, Archives of Internal Medicine, Jama)
Let’s see, how can I say this – Radiation causes cancer. We have known this to be true for a long time. Add the radiation risk factor to women that already possess the BCR1 gene and the outcome is nothing less than – medically induced breast cancer.
A new study just presented at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), concludes the low-dose radiation from annual mammography screening significantly increases breast cancer risk in women with a genetic or familial predisposition to breast cancer. Nobel laureate, Dr. John Gofman, believed that 50% of today’s breast cancer was caused by unnecessary radiation primarily related to diagnostic x-ray studies. (Dr. James Howenstine, MD., DO MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE BREAST CANCER?, (February 28, 2006), NewsWithViews.com: http:// www.newswithviews.com/ Howenstine/james42.htm)
A study conducted at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, looked at breast cancer mortality statistics in this group of women following five annual mammograms starting at various ages, they found a disturbing trend: far more cases of breast cancer developed than were expected. (Sherry baker, Health Sciences Editor, Early Mammograms May Trigger Genetic Breast Cancer, February 08, Natural News.com: http://www.naturalnews.com/ 025560 cancer brs women.html)
According to Dr. Kramer, associate director for disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health, finding those insignificant cancers is the reason the breast and prostate cancer rates soared when screening was introduced. And those cancers, he said, are the reason screening has the problem called over-diagnosis — labeling innocuous tumors as cancer and treating them as though they could be lethal when in fact they are not dangerous.
Over-diagnosis is pure, unadulterated harm.
“Politically, it’s almost unacceptable, If you question over-diagnosis in breast cancer, you are against women. If you question over-diagnosis in prostate cancer, you are against men.” Dr. Peter Albertsen, chief and program director of the urology division at the University of Connecticut Health Center. (Gina Kolata, Cancer Society, in Shift, Has Concerns on Screenings, (October 20, 2009 , ) The New York Times, NY, NY)
Fluoride and our Drinking Water
"Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time." Robert Carton, Ph.D. former US EPA scientist (Fluoridation quotes http:// www whale to/b/ fluoride q.html ).
At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast I. G. Farben chemical plants in Germany. While there he was told by German chemists of a plan which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.
On October 2nd, 1954, Charles Eliot Perkins summarized his findings in a letter to the US State Department, in which he said:
"In the 1930's, Hitler and the German Nazi's envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...
Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy] …
I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." - CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954 (Ian E. Stephens, Fluoridation: Mind Control of the Masses, (August/September 95), Nexus Magazine, http:// befreetech com/ fluoridation htm ).
In the 1950’s USAF Major George Jordan testified before UnAmerican Activity Committees of Congress that during his post as US-Soviet liaison officer, the Soviets openly admitted to "using fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient" (http: //www bibliotecapleyades net/ sociopolitica/ atlantean conspiracy/ atlantean conspiracy28.htm ).
To make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient?
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty” (Dan Montgomery, The system of fluoridation and mind control endangers your health and your freedom, 2000 ).
Fluoride makes people more susceptible to such things as subliminal messages and mind control. ....fluoride damages an area in the left occipital lobe of the brain. This is said to make people more docile. Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal (The Truth Of Mass Mind Control -sodium Fluoride, http: //forum davidicke com/ showthread php?t=23191).
The Conspiracy of Orthodox Medicine
Orthodox Medicine is not the champion of good health. The Medical Industry should be the leading advocate against toxins in our environment and food supply. Instead, pharmaceutical corporations fund the education system to graduate pill-pushing physicians; and the FDA sits quietly by as the mega corporations taint our food supply with a smorgasbord of man-made chemicals. Sugar cartels overflow with profit, and as a hedge fund, they invest heavily in pharmaceuticals and medicine.
The Scale of the Conspiracy is Enormous
There just seems to be a collusion of interest conspiring to maximize profit throughout the industry, instead of being completely focused on the quality of an individual’s health. Hollywood has never made a conspiracy movie yet than can compare to the overwhelming scale of the Monopoly of Orthodox Medicine.
To understand the scale of it all requires a history lesson about a man named,
“John D. Rockefeller.”
Post-Civil War America
North America holds an interesting place in the history of our planet. Face it, at the time of the American Revolution, new countries anywhere else on the planet came with a pre-existing infrastructure. Europe, Africa, and Asia had been occupied for a long time. New countries there could only alter what was already built. America had an entire continent to exploit.
At the end of the Civil War, America was divided into 3 sections. The North had all the power, all the industry, and all the money. The South was in ruin and needed investment to rebuild. The American West exploding with Civil War refugees, and also needing the investment to build the rail lines and highways that would eventually tame the West.
People such as: Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas Edison were changing the way we live. Business opportunities over the next 40 years, or so, gave birth to some of the worlds richest men. Andrew Carnage made the iron, J. P. Morgan managed the railroads and financed the deals, and John D. Rockefeller supplied the oil and kerosene.
This economic explosion required our relatively new, and recently reorganized, nation to address issues of Interstate Commerce. New laws were created to protect the public from profiteering and price fixing.
John D. Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Trust
You can’t blame John D. Rockefeller for trying to be an astute businessman. He and his partners came up with the idea of a corporate trust. Standard Oil of Ohio only sold products in Ohio. Standard Oil of Indiana was a completely different company operating within a different state. Standard Oil of New Jersey was a completely different company within a completely different state. No interstate commerce and therefore out of the reach of federal regulation. Rockefeller and his associates were just masters of each company.
The 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust act was designed to breakup the monopoly of corporate trusts, like Standard Oil. So, the shell game of company names changed. Stock portfolios swapped positions. Acquisitions were made. But still – The Rockefeller Standard Oil Trust is parent to them all.
In 1911, the federal court forced Standard Oil to break up into 34 different companies. Over the next 88 years, larger companies bought out smaller companies and mergers were made. Today only four Standard Oil Companies survive:
Standard Oil of New Jersey (Exxon) and its worldwide division Esso,
Standard Oil of New York (Mobil)
Standard Oil of Indiana (British Petroleum), which parents Ammaco, Arco, Truckstops of America, and Gas-n-Go.
Standard Oil of California (Chevron), witch parents Gulf, Conoco, Marathon, Ashland, Phillips, Speedways, Starvin Martins, Super Americas, Atlantic, Union 76, Unocal, and Circle K.
In 1999, Exxon and Mobil merged to form the largest corporation in the history of the planet. Both Standard Oil and the Rockefeller trust are alive and well.
But what doses OIL have to do with Medicine?
Absolutely the biggest spin-off industries from oil are petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. By 1900, the Rockefeller Family had already expended heavily in both industries. William "Old Bill" Rockefeller, the father of John D, proclaimed himself a physician and began selling bottled raw petroleum on the yokels as a miracle cure for everything under the sun. In selling raw petroleum in a pretty bottle "Old Bill" did nothing new. He merely took a page out of the book of other patent medicine fakers who were then pedaling their wares from the backs of wagons - covered and uncovered.
"Old Bill" called his bottled petroleum "Nujo" (meaning new oil) and was eventually sold as a cure for constipation. (Rx List, The Internet Drug Index.) Today Nujol is an important material used in infrared spectroscopy. It is heavy paraffin oil so it is chemically inert and has a relatively uncomplicated IR spectrum. (Wikipedia English - The Free Encyclopedia)
1,000 six-ounce bottles of finished Nujol could be made from just one $2.00 barrel of raw material. These breath-taking profits make it inevitable that America's largest and most ruthless industrial combine (the Rockefeller Empire) should soon add drug trafficking to its already vast production and sales domain. It wasn't until 1929, however, when the Rockefeller Drug Trust was formed, that the upward curve in their drug profits began to assume the present gigantic proportions of today.
A New face for John D. Rockefeller
After the Court ordered breakup of Standard Oil, the American population saw John D. Rockefeller as the worst type of “Robber Baron” that ever lived. The Rockefeller Family, decided to hire the most talented press agent in the country, Ivy Lee, who got the tough assignment of whitewashing the tycoon's bloodied image.
Lee used the newly organized Rockefeller Foundation for promotional purposes by donating large sums of money - none less than a million - to well-known colleges, hospitals, churches and benevolent organizations. The Rockefeller Foundation made headlines all over the world, for in the days of the gold standard and the five-cent cigar, a million dollars was always news. The public soon forgot, or forgave, for the dazzling display of Rockefellerian generosity and philanthropy.
Rockefeller became one of the first great benefactors of Humanity.
1901, he founded the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York. It later changed its name to Rockefeller University in 1965, after expanding its mission to include graduate education. It claims a connection to 23 Nobel laureates.
1904, The Rockefeller Foundation was originally set up as the General Education Fund.
1909, The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission, an organization that eventually eradicated the hookworm disease that had long plagued the American South.
1913, The Rockefeller Foundation was created to continue and expand the scope of the work of the Sanitary Commission.
He gave nearly $250 million to his foundation, which focused on public health, medical training, and the arts.
It endowed Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, the first of its kind.
1918, Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Foundation, supported work in the social studies; it was later absorbed back into the parent Rockefeller Foundation.
However, all told, Rockefeller gave away about $550 million and with the help of Rockefeller millions. Subsequently, the foundation placed it's own "nominees" in federal health agencies and set the stage for the "reeducation" of the public.
The American Medical Association
Originally founded, in 1847, at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, by Nathan Davis, the American Medical Association (AMA) had little power; until the influx of Rockefeller monies and the Orthodoxy provided by Scientifically sanctioned, Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research.
In 1901AMA reorganizes, creating the House of Delegates and acquires its first permanent headquarters in Chicago, in 1902.
1904 AMA establishes the Council on Medical Education to accelerate campaign to raise educational requirements for physicians
1905 AMA establishes Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry to set standards for drug manufacturing and advertising and fight the war on quack patent medicines.
Then there was the problem of pharmacists selling drugs without a doctor's prescription. This was denounced and the American Pharmaceutical Association, controlled by the AMA, tried to stamp out this low-cost, but in great demand practice.
In nearly every State, the AMA secured laws that made it illegal for patients to seek treatment from a pharmacist. But still common were pharmacists who refilled prescriptions at customer request. The AMA lobbied to make this illegal, too, but most State legislatures wouldn't go along with this because of constituent pressure. The AMA eventually got its way with the assistance of the federal government, of course.
AMA Council on Medical Education develops and publishes in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) the minimum and ideal curriculum standards for medical schools.
1906 AMA Council on Medical Education publishes directory of medical schools in the United States and detailing entrance requirements.
AMA publishes first American Medical Directory listing over 128,000 licensed physicians in US and Canada. (Hans Ruesch, Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire, (1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, ftp://ftp.win.net/winnet/ tetra/pub/ Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire.txt)
Rockefeller to the rescue
The American Medical Association created the Council on Medical Education for the express purpose of surveying the status of medical training throughout the country and of making specific recommendations for its improvement, in 1904. But by 1908 it had run into serious difficulty as a result of committee differences and insufficient funding.
It was into this void that the Rockefeller-Carnegie philanthropic team moved with brilliant strategy and perfect timing. Henry S. Pritchett, the president of the Carnegie Foundation, approached the AMA and simply offered to take over the entire project. They offered up The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching to conduct the survey and appointed a schoolmaster and educational theorist Abraham Flexner to head the project.
Here was the classical "philanthropic formula" at work again. Have others pay a major portion of the bill and reap a large bonus from public opinion (isn't it wonderful that these men are taking an interest in upgrading medical education!), and gain an opportunity to control a large and vital sphere of American life.
Flexner Report 1910
The Flexner Report, as it was called, was published in 1910. It has shaped public opinion to this very day. The report quite correctly pointed out the inadequacies of medical education at the time. No one could take exception with that. It also proposed a wide range of sweeping changes, most of which were entirely sound. No one could take exception with those, either. Changes that included the strengthening of courses in pharmacology and the addition of research departments at all "qualified," or should I say – “Orthodox” medical schools.
And so, the Flexner Report was above reproach. Rockefeller and Carnegie began immediately to shower hundreds of millions of dollars on those medical schools that were vulnerable to control. Those that did not conform were denied the funds and the prestige that came with those funds, and were forced out of business.
A hundred and sixty schools were in operation in 1905. By 1927, the number had dropped to eighty. True, most of those that were edged out had been sub-standard. But so were some of those that received foundation money and survived. The primary test was not their previous standing but their willingness to accept foundation influence and control.
Schools such as: Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, Yale, Johns Hopkins, New York's Columbia University, Cornell University, etc., etc, received a lot of Rockefeller’s Drug Trust money.
In only 44 years, The Rockefeller Foundation made gifts to colleges and public agencies totaling somewhat over half a billion dollars. These colleges, of course, teach their students all the drug lore the Rockefeller pharmaceutical houses want taught. (Hans Ruesch, Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire, (1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, ftp://ftp.win.net/winnet/tetra/pub/Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire.txt)
The Rockefeller family sponsored research and donated sums to universities and medical schools, which had drug based research. They further extended this policy to foreign universities and medical schools where research was drug based through the International Education Board. Research, that was not drug based were refused funding and soon dissolved in favor of the lucrative pharmaceutical industry. (Source Watch, Pharmaceutical industry, (2009),http://www.sourcewatch.org)
And while "giving away" those huge sums to drug-propagandizing colleges, the Rockefeller interests were growing to a worldwide network that no one could entirely explore.
The Purchase of Public Opinion
In the following years, not only newsmen, but whole newspapers were bought, financed or founded with Rockefeller money. Time Magazine, which Henry Luce started in 1923, had been taken over by J.P. Morgan. When Morgan died the House of Rockefeller wasted no time in taking over this lush editorial plum also, together with its sisters Fortune and Life, and built for them an expensive 14-story home of their own in Rockefeller Center — the Time & Life Building, later to house the National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC).
Rockefeller was also co-owner of Time's "rival" magazine, Newsweek, which had been established in the early days of the New Deal with money put up by Rockefeller, and his allies. (Hans Ruesch, Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire, (1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, ftp://ftp.win.net/ winnet/ tetra/ pub/ Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire.txt)
The Intellectuals — A Bargain
For all his innate cynicism, John D. Rockefeller must have been himself surprised to discover how easily the so-called intellectuals could be bought. Indeed, they turned out to be among his best investments.
By founding and lavishly endowing his Education Boards at home and abroad, Rockefeller won control not only of the governments, but also of the intellectual and scientific community, forming the priests of the New Religion – “Orthodox Medicine.” No Pulitzer, or Nobel or any similar prize endowed with money, has ever been awarded to a declared foe of the Rockefeller system.
After the Court ordered 1911 breakup of Standard Oil, John D. Rockefeller was seen as the worst type of “Robber Baron” that ever lived. By 1956, Time Magazine put John D Rockefeller Junior on the cover and titled his story as simply - "The Good Man.” In 1979, when John D. Rockefeller Junior’s son, Nelson Rockefeller, died; Time’s obituary declared, "He was driven by a mission to serve, improve and uplift his country." (Hans Ruesch, Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire, (1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, ftp://ftp.win.net/winnet/tetra/pub/Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire.txt)
Millions of Dollars Free Publicity
The Encyclopedia Britannica’s eleventh edition (1910-11) was produced in cooperation with Cambridge University. The Encyclopedia later moved to Chicago to add to the glory of the University of Chicago and its medical school. The Rockefeller recipe for Orthodox Medicine gained legitimacy and gets millions of dollars free publicity thanks to the worldwide engagement of the Rockefeller Foundation and the media makers who are in no position to oppose it.
1929 Rockefeller Drug Trust
The 1929 Drug Trust alliance was formed by the Rockefeller Empire and the German chemical company IG Farben (Bayer). I.G. Farbenindustrie AG was a German conglomerate. Its name literally meant a Community of Interest. The company was formed in 1925 from a number of major companies that had been working together closely since World War I. During its heyday IG Farben was the fourth-largest company in the world. (wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben)
I.G Farben was Europe’s solution to intra-national commerce dictated by the geology and economics of Europe. It was a Trust, of sorts, forming a conglomerate buying and marketing network.
In 1929, Rockefeller and I.G. Farben cut a deal. Rockefeller would sell oil but not drugs and have the hydrogenation patent for use outside of Germany; I/G. Farben would stay out of oil outside of Germany and sell only chemicals. I.G. Farben also received 2% of Standard’s stock, worth $35 million. In 1930, the 2 giants established a joint company to develop the oil-chemical field. Over the decades, the Rockefeller/I.G. Farben cartel would reap massive profits from both areas.
Rockefeller and Genocide
Few people are aware that Auschwitz was a 100% subsidiary of IG Farben. On April 14, 1941, Otto Armbrust, the IG Farben board member responsible for the Auschwitz project, stated to board colleagues:
"… our new friendship with the SS is a blessing. We have determined all measures integrating the concentration camps to benefit our company."
Human experiments with drug and vaccine testing killed thousands of prisoners. The Nuremberg Tribunal executed longtime Bayer employee and SS Auschwitz doctor, Helmut Vetter, for administering fatal infections. Part of the evidence against him at trial was a memo to his bosses at Bayer headquarters:
"I have thrown myself into my work wholeheartedly. Especially as I have the opportunity to test our new preparations. I feel like I am in paradise."
All together, the Nuremberg Tribunal convicted 24 IG Farben board members and executives on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other crimes.
The Nuremberg Tribunal dissolved IG Farben into BASF, Bayer and Hoechst (Sanofi-Aventis), each company 20 times as large as IG Farben in 1944. For almost three decades after WWII, the chairmen of the board for each of these companies were former members of the Nazi regime. (Source Watch, Pharmaceutical industry (2009), http://www.sourcewatch.org)
With Rockerfellerian investment, other I.G. Farben corporations survived within the alliance. Well known companies such as General Mills, Kellogg, Nestle, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Procter and Gamble, and Roche . (Hauns Ruesch, The Truth About the Rockefeller Drug Empire: The Drug Story (Fall-Winter 1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/rockefeller-drug-empire-story.html)
By 1961, the Rockefeller Empire owned over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States and it is the largest drug-manufacturing combine in the world. Since WWII, the pharmaceutical industry has steadily netted increasing profits to become the world’s second largest manufacturing industry; second only to the arms industry. (Source Watch, Pharmaceutical industry (2009), http://www.sourcewatch.org)
The Proof is in the Profit
Any business, which makes 6% on its invested capital, is considered a sound moneymaker. Sterling Drug, Inc., the largest holding company in the Rockefeller Drug Empire and its 68 subsidiaries, showed operating profits in 1961 of 54%.
Squibb, another Rockefeller-controlled company, in 1945 made not 6% but 576% on the actual value of its property. That was during the luscious war years when the Army Surgeon General’s Office and the Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery were not only acting as promoters for the Drug Trust, but were actually forcing drug trust poisons into the blood streams of American soldiers, sailors and marines.
It has been asked, any wonder that the Rockefellers, and their stooges in the Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Public Health Service, the Federal Trade Commission, the Better Business Bureau, the Army Medical Corps, the Navy Bureau of Medicine, and thousands of health officers all over the country, should combine to put out of business all forms of therapy that discourage the use of drugs. (Hauns Ruesch, The Truth About the Rockefeller Drug Empire: The Drug Story (Fall-Winter 1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/ rockefeller-drug-empire-story.html)
Secret American Research
The Nuremberg Tribunal convicted 24 IG Farben board members and executives on the basis of mass murder and other crimes. The Nazis committed hideous crimes again humanity! Nothing like that could ever happen in America – RIGHT?
1931, Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations, infects human subjects with cancer cells. He later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. While there, he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.
1940, Four hundred prisoners in Chicago are infected with Malaria in order to study the effects of new and experimental drugs to combat the disease. Nazi doctors later on trial at Nuremberg cite this American study to defend their own actions during the Holocaust.
1942, Chemical Warfare Services begins mustard gas experiments on approximately 4,000 servicemen. The experiments continue until 1945 and made use of Seventh Day Adventists who chose to become human guinea pigs rather than serve on active duty.
1945, Project Paperclip is initiated. The U.S. State Department, Army intelligence, and the CIA recruit Nazi scientists and offer them immunity and secret identities in exchange for work on top-secret government projects in the United States.
1946, Patients in VA hospitals are used as guinea pigs for medical experiments. In order to reduce suspicions, the order is given to change the word "experiments" to "investigations" or "observations" whenever reporting a medical study performed in one of the nation's veteran's hospitals.
1947, Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission issues a secret document (Document 07075001, January 8, 1947) stating that the agency will begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects.
1953, CIA initiates Project MKULTRA. This is an eleven-year research program designed to produce and test drugs and biological agents that would be used for mind control and behavior modification. Six of the subprojects involved testing the agents on unwitting human beings.
1956, U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Ga and Avon Park, Fl. Following each test, Army agents posing as public health officials test victims for effects.
1965, Project CIA and Department of Defense begin Project MKSEARCH, a program to develop a capability to manipulate human behavior through the use of mind-altering drugs.
1965, Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along.
1977, Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research confirm that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Some of the areas included San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.
1987, Department of Defense admits that, despite a treaty banning research and development of biological agents, it continues to operate research facilities at 127 facilities and universities around the nation.
1995, U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.
1995, Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/experiment.htm
2009, President Obama and the US Apologizes for 1940s STD Study that infected Guatemalans with syphilis. In an effort to see if penicillin could prevent or treat syphilis, government scientists went to the impoverished Central American country to deliberately infect nearly 700 men and women -- including prisoners, inmates in insane asylums, and even some soldiers -- with the potentially fatal sexually transmitted disease. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) was the US government body that funded the study. ( ABC News,http:// abcnews.go.com / WN/us-apologizes std study infected Guatemalans syphilis1940s/ story?id= 11779633# T5RBttVMlGQ); and (Agence France Presse, http:// www.alternet.org/rss/ breaking news / 292261 / Obama apologizes to Guatemala for us sex-disease study? page= entire)
Rockefeller Drug Laws
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, New York legislators faced a drug problem they feared was growing out of control and state police saw a 31 percent increase in drug arrests by 1972. In response Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, a liberal-leaning Republican who was said to have had presidential aspirations, created the Narcotic Addiction and Control Commission in 1967
The “Fed” followed with the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 1970, a law requiring the pharmaceutical industry to maintain physical security and strict record keeping for certain types of drugs. Controlled substances are divided into five schedules (or classes) on the basis of their potential for abuse, accepted medical use, and accepted safety under medical supervision: narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, and anabolic steroids.
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was enacted into law by the Congress of the United States as Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. The CSA is the federal U.S. drug policy under which the manufacture, importation, possession, distribution, and use of certain substances is regulated.
The 1973Rockefeller Drug Laws of New York created mandatory minimum sentences of 15 years to life for possession of four ounces of narcotics — about the same as a sentence for second-degree murder. The effect of the new sentencing guidelines has been dramatic. Drug offenders as a percentage of New York's prison population surged from 11% in 1973 to a peak of 35% in 1994. (Madison Gray, A Brief History Of New York's Rockefeller Drug Laws, (Apr. 02, 2009), Time Magazine, NY, www.time.com)
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was also established in 1973. It proposed the creation of a single federal agency to enforce the federal drug laws as well as consolidate and coordinate the government's drug control activities. Thus creating the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and the Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement.
Existing regulation mandates that only physicians can deal these drugs. These new Rockefeller Drug Laws makes possessing, or dealing, in these drugs outside of the medical machine a harsh and despicable crime.
A Mixed Message Indeed
The social message is reported as: Don’t Do Drugs! We tell our children to Just SAY NO! Yet, this same society walks around with their own private stash of Pharmaceuticals.
A new government study finds a 400 percent increase in the number of people admitted to treatment for abusing prescription pain medication. The increase in substance abuse among people ages 12 and older was recorded during the 10-year-period from 1998 to 2008. It spans every gender, race, ethnicity, education and employment level, and all regions of the country.
The study was released by the White House office of drug control policy says prescription drug abuse is now the second-most prevalent form of illicit drug use in the country, and the nation's fastest-growing drug problem. (Associated Press, Gov't Says Abuse of Prescription Meds Skyrocketing, (July 15, 2010), http://www.foxnews.com/ story/ 0,2933,596823,00.html)
Ah – the American dream: Find something you can make for a dime, sell for a dollar, and is addictive.
Orthodox Medicine Today
The Commonwealth Fund, of New York, performed a survey of health care attitudes and experiences from patients in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. (Cathy Schoen, M.S., Robin Osborn, M.B.A., Michelle M. Doty, Ph.D., Meghan Bishop, M.Sc., Jordon Peugh, M.A., and Nandita Murukutla, Toward Higher-Performance Health Systems: Adults' Health Care Experiences in Seven Countries, 2007, November 1, 2007 | Volume 92/ The Commonwealth Fund, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/ Content/Publications )
Here are summaries of some of the findings:
1. We spend more money on medicine than any other country in the world.
In 2007, the last year for which fairly precise estimates in American health spending are available, we spent $2.24 trillion on health care in this country. It amounted to $7,421 per person living within our borders. According to the resulting Milliman Medical Index, the average health spending for the typical 2008 American family of four would be close to $16,700. ( Economix, Explaining the science of everyday life, Reader Response: How Much Do We Spend on Health Care? June 5, 2009, 6:58 am http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/05)
2. We don't pay doctors according to the quality of their care.
The Hollywood image of doctors is torn between the rich and the very rich.
3. Our patients skip care due to cost. And here, America is far worse than anywhere else.
4. Most of us don't have a regular physician. One might expect, given what we pay, that our care would at least be more central and convenient. But it's not so. Of everyone surveyed, Americans were the least likely to report a doctor or general practitioner they routinely saw. As a result, Americans are the most likely to say their doctor doesn't know important information about their medical history, which has obvious implications for care quality, medical errors, etc.
5. Our care isn't particularly convenient.
6. We spend more than $500 out-of-pocket on prescription drugs annually.
More than 125,000 people die annually in the U.S. from adverse reactions to correctly prescribed medicines. (James Howenstine M.D., Do Mammograms Cause Cancer?, (Feb. 28, 2006), A physician’s Guide to natural Health Products that Work, Penhurst Books)
7. Americans have the highest rate of chronic disease and our high rates of chronic disease attributable for about 2/3rds the rise in health spending over the past few decades.
North America leads the world in the rate of cancers diagnosed in adults, followed closely by Western Europe, according to a recent estimate of worldwide cancer rates. (Dr Mercola, Rate of Cancer Highest in North America, (January 19 2002), http://articles.mercola.com/ sites/articles/archive/ 2002/01/19/cancer-rates-part-one.aspx)
My personal favorite is the epidemic of Adult Onset Diabetes and Glucose Intolerance in our society.
8. But we're not treating them properly. So given the high prevalence of such diseases, and the pressures they exert on our system, you'd hope our system had evolved so as to treat these diseases more effectively.
Not so. One of the big issues with chronic disease is coordination of care. Illnesses like diabetes and kidney failure have so many manifestations, and require so much maintenance, that it's critical for care providers to have a full picture of what treatments are being received, what the patient's medical history is, what therapies they will and will not follow, etc. And for that reason, it's critical for the patients to have a single medical home – a regular care center where their case is understood, tracked, and treated. (Ten Reasons Why American Health Care Is so Bad. Ezra Klein | November 2, 2007, The American Prospect, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article)
9. Along with Australians, Americans are the most likely to report a medical, medication, or lab error the effects are bad for our health and, needless to say, bad for our insurance rates.
10. Americans are the least likely to report relative satisfaction, and the most likely to call for a fundamental rebuilding.
The CIA’s own web page ranks life expectancy in The United States as 49th. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html
The Rockefeller Legacy
Orthodox Medicine kills morepeople through mistakes, drug side effects, hospital-acquired infections, and botched surgical procedures, many of which are totally unnecessary, than any of the diseases they claim to treat!
How can this be true? Surely modern medicine is the most technologically advanced, capable, and freely available humanity has ever had? Well, yes.... and no!
It is true that technological advancements have continued to bring new possibilities to modern medicine; many of these advances are questionable, either in terms of their necessity, their results or their practical application.
At the same time, centuries old, proven forms of medicine have been ignored, shelved and increasingly ridiculed by a pharmaceutical-based organization that doesn't understand them - and doesn't want to.
Even when convincing and consistent natural treatments are brought to light that are far more successful than their modern, pharmaceutical alternatives, the hierarchy of modern medicine not only ridicules them, but refuse to even study them - so much for their interest in human health!
How can this be? Surely Doctors are the most altruistic of beings, determined to help others at every opportunity?
Well, yes, and no. Perhaps Doctors see their role as providing help to the needy, their hands are hopelessly tied, and their education directed, by Government, regulatory authorities and research bodies that are entirely under the control of the industrial and pharmaceutical giants.
It is a sad fact that virtually 100% of ALL medical education, both under-graduate and post-graduate, is paid for either directly or indirectly by the pharmaceutical industry. As such, the industry can control the educational agenda and our doctors are now taught little except how to control the symptoms of disease, preferably with long-term drug use.
It is not the Doctors themselves that are at fault, but the pharmaceutical marketing system that trains them. (Hauns Ruesch, The Truth About the Rockefeller Drug Empire: The Drug Story (Fall-Winter 1993), CIVIS Foundation Report number 15, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/rockefeller-drug-empire-story.html)
Obama Care - The Standard Oil Dynasty expands into Government
Consider John D Rockefeller and The Standard Oil Trust. Is profit the only goal? Or is there and element of population control? Was the Rockefeller philanthropic investment in education and public health just the act of a good guy, or the deliberated attempt to identify, and then monopolize the next generation of public health care on an un-imaginable scale? Again I ask, is profit the only goal, or is there and element of population control?
The merger between the Rockefeller and the U.S. Government happened long ago. The Rockefeller Foundation was approached by the U.S. Defense Department to help fund non-medical scientific research at universities. The Foundation’s work in the natural sciences begins with support to the National Research Council to establish fellowships in physics and chemistry.
Albert Einstein sent a request for $500 to John D. Rockefeller's top lieutenant, Rockefeller instructed his deputy, "Let's give him $1,000. He may be onto something." They experimented, adapted, and changed course when necessary. They didn't use the word innovation then; they called it "scientific philanthropy." But innovation was their game. (The Rockefeller Foundation, Our History - A Powerful Legacy. http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/who-we-are/our-history)
In apparent appreciation, our government co-conspired with Orthodox Medicine to conduct secrete Auschwitz style experiments on our own population. Government validates Orthodox Medicine and pharmacology by regulation and law. In the name of Public Health many vaccines and medical exams are mandated.
2006 Merck, of Dallas Texas, acquired FDA approval of its HPV vaccine. By April of 2007, 28 states either mandated or considered its use for all Junior High School girls.
How closer of a marriage can there be?
Rockefeller’s Silent Partner – Finance - Obama’s Single Party Payer
Behind every business deal anywhere there is the ever-present silent partner of finance.“In 1913, it was pretty clear that J. P. Morgan - The House of Morgan - was the dominant banking influence. But today, that seems to have shifted to the Rockefellers. There's no doubt in my mind today that the Rockefellers are the dominant banking force in the United States.” ( Victor Thorn & Lisa Guliani, Interview with G. Edward Griffin, Author of 'The Creature from Jekyll Island' , April 2, 2004http://www.whale.to/b/griffin3.html)
The Federal Reserve System was written by the money trust. The people who attended that meeting were the epitome of the money trust. These were literally the wealthiest men in the world. The wealth controlled by the seven men who went to that meeting represented, approximately one-fourth of the wealth of the entire world. We're talking about the J. P. Morgan dynasty, the Rockefeller dynasty, Kuhn Loeb & Company, the Rothschilds from Europe, and the Warburgs from Germany and the Netherlands. These were the people who were represented at that meeting, and they are the ones who created the Federal Reserve System - supposedly - to break the grip of the money trust.
When you envision these same men sitting around the table at a clubhouse, all of a sudden you realize, "Oh my gosh, the Federal Reserve System is a CARTEL." And that is exactly what it is. It is not a government agency. It is a cartel no different than the banana cartel, the oil cartel, or Orthodox Medicine. It just happens to be a banking cartel.” ( Victor Thorn & Lisa Guliani, Interview with G. Edward Griffin, Author of 'The Creature from Jekyll Island', April 2, 2004http://www.whale.to/b/griffin3.html)
President Obama has pushes Health Care Finance toward a Single Party Payer System governed by the same people, that were educated and finance by the powers; that establish the need for service, set the price of that service, and manufactures the medication to pacify the service.
Mobil merged with Exxon, Obama Care merges with Orthodox Medicine, Standard Oil is alive and well.
Is profit the only goal? Or is there and element of population control?
Are we pawns in someone else’s game?
The obvious result of: Mega-Corp – Education - Orthodox Medicine – Pharmaceuticals – Mandated and Regulated by Government – and now Financed via Federal Law was clear years ago.
Dr. S. S. Goldwater, New York Commissioner of Hospitals pointed out in The Modern Hospital Magazinethat the present measures used to check contagious diseases may permit of longer life — but not of stronger life. As a result of the drugs, vaccines and other suppressive treatments used to check diseases, he says that, "chronic diseases are growing at such a rate that America may become a nation of invalids. Over half the hospital beds are filled with chronic sufferers, both old and young." (from Health Practitioner’s Journal, June, 1944)
We spend more money on medicine than any other country in the world. Yet, North America leads the world in the rate of cancers. Diabetes and Glucose Intolerance impact every community.
Just what is the legacy Orthodox Medicine built for us?
America’s Growing Problem and the Bariatrics Business Room. The cover story of: DOTmedbusiness NEWS, August 22-26, Washington DC. Speaks to standard hospital equipment not being sturdy enough to accommodate fatter and fatter patients. Oversized beds with mechanical lifts, heavy-duty wheelchairs, oversized X-Ray equipment, wider doors, bigger rooms, are just a few of the current and future needs of the medical industry.
Social Science - and Mrs. John D. Rockefeller
The 1918 Laura Spelman Rockefeller Foundation's stated mandate was the promotion of the welfare of women and children worldwide. It became the major American supporter of applied social science. Areas of special interests were child study, education, public health, race relations, religion, social studies, and social welfare. The idea was commitment to social betterment through science, creating the entire professional scientific subculture of child development and parent education.
The Foundation established research centers– usually called institutes of child welfare–at Teachers College, Columbia University, Yale University, the University of Toronto, the University of Minnesota, and the University of California at Berkeley. Yale’s research center was later reborn through its Institute of Psychology as the Institute of Human Relations.
Other agencies that received aid from the Foundation were the Brookings Institution, the Institute of Pacific Relations, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the Committee on Child Development of the National Research Council. And of course -- It funded the journals that promoted their science, all produced under the guidance of the Social Science Research Council. (The Rockefeller Archive Center, LAURA SPELMAN ROCKEFELLER MEMORIAL ARCHIVES, (1918-1930)-1949, www.rockarch.org/ collections/ rockorgs/lsrm.php)
The Foundation was active for only 11 years before being reabsorbed by its parenting Rockefeller Foundation and General Education Fund. Yet, grant applications are available online today from The Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial. More importantly – the research continues.
Ponder this:
In the struggle of the Elite to maintain power and control, just who becomes the enemy? Research funded by the same Elite that owns our Government; therefore, fully married with military experiments and black-op programs, exploring the boundaries of Psychological Warfare, Biological Warfare, and Chemical Warfare. The same Elite that owns and validates the educational curriculum that spawns our culture, and then moderates our culture by the media, both printed and visual, through ownership of The News, Political Commentary, and Hollywood.
In the struggle of the Elite to maintain power and control, is there a collusion of interest attempting to control everything we are taught, read, or see? Conditioning the population into what to think, what to buy, who to elect, what to believe, who to hate, and more importantly, what wars to fight.
In the struggle of the Elite to maintain power and control, would there be any benefit to a population of dulled IQ, docile, and easily controlled? Or any benefit of a population weighted by chronic health issues and totally dependent upon the cash flow monopoly of Orthodox Medicine-Pharmacology Mega-Corp. Generating a society totally dependent upon Federal Insurance Programs, like Medicare, Medicaid, and now Obama Care to finance the cost of staying alive.
Is there really a World Elite?
Read and re-read this history from any angle you want. There can be no doubt that the Rockefeller Family Empire network has direct responsibility for almost every aspect of our culture today.
The question to Ponder is this: Is 150 years of apparent good intentioned independent humanitarian acts resulting in a global capitalistic beast that has less concern, than reported, for the general population. Sidetracking the population with the burdens of Orthodox Medicine and Consumer Debt, so this beast can use our governments for other global agendas?
